![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
| Dovetail Report: September 2005 Are Life Cycle-Based Labeling and a Broadening of Environmental Certification Programs Needed?
There are vast differences in the environmental impacts associated with producing various building materials. Such impacts are virtually unknown to the consuming public. In addition, there are environmental, social, and economic concerns and issues associated with production of all basic raw materials. In the building materials arena, where only wood products manufacturers and distributors are currently asked to demonstrate environmentally sustainable practices, there is no justifiable reason for not now seeking the same assurances from manufacturers and distributors of all other products used in construction.
There are life-cycle-analysis (LCA) based programs now in place that would allow rapid development of rigorous, self-sustaining, scientifically based transparent information regarding environmental performance for a wide range of products. The use of LCA derived information in environmental programs such as LEED [1] has the potential to significantly increase the objectivity, clarity, and capacity of such programs.
With respect to building materials it is clearly time to expand current requirements for certification of wood products in green building programs to include all products used in framing, decking, sheathing, and cladding. It is also time to give serious consideration to LCA-based product labeling of all construction materials.
[1] Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED), a program of the U.S Green Building Council
|
528 Hennepin Ave, Suite 202 Minneapolis, MN 55403 Phone: 612-333-0430 Fax: 612-333-0432 info@dovetailinc.org |
| © 2007 Dovetail Partners, Inc. | ![]() |
info@dovetailinc.org |